The increase in mental health awareness within the last few years is something we should be proud of. The awareness of the stigma and the boom of programs and services devoted to the prevention, management, and treatment of mental illness is truly a great feat. The representation of mental illness in big brands and in popular culture is a huge step forward in reducing the stigma associated with mental illness. However, someone is bound to try to capitalize on mental health simply because it's becoming popular with consumers.
So, what does this look like? How do we tell when a company genuinely cares about our mental health, or whether they are only interested in our money? I plan to tackle these questions by focusing on internet-based therapy, a recent development in mental health that has made its way into popular culture. Brands like "BetterHelp" have been making waves on social media, with influencers both promoting and criticizing the claims made by these services.
What Services Are Out There?
The American Psychological Association (APA) lists some services on their website and gives a quick summary of the cost and what they offer. I've listed the most relevant companies below and attached links to their websites. You can visit this APA website for a comprehensive list of accredited services.- BetterHelp: Offers online messaging, live phone and video chat ($35 USD/week).
- Breakthrough: Offers video conferencing (costs are determined by therapist).
- 7 Cups of Tea: Offers messaging ($37.50 USD/week or $150 USD/month).
- Talk Space: Offers text messaging, video and voice chat ($32 USD/week).
What Does Science Say?
With all of this in mind, I'm going to turn your attention to psychological science that speaks to the effectiveness of internet-based therapy, namely, Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT). You may have heard of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) because of it's wide-spread use. You may even have undergone CBT yourself. For those who are unfamiliar, the main goal of CBT is to change the patterns of thinking and behaviour that are behind dysfunctional emotions and psychological difficulties. The following study examined this therapeutic approach, but the researchers wanted to take a look at how effective it was when administered online rather than in-person.
This 2018 article published in the Journal of Anxiety Disorders, uses a meta-analysis approach (examining an entire body of research on a given topic, and summarizing the results) to evaluate the effectiveness of i-CBT. The researchers looked at 107 studies that compared iCBT to a control group of individuals who were 18 years of age or older and diagnosed with a variety of psychological disorders (primarily anxiety and depressive disorders). Overall, this research demonstrates that "computerized therapy for anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable, and practical healthcare" (Andrews et al., 2018). In addition, the researchers also answered some other important questions regarding its effectiveness:
Is It Harmful?: The results could not conclude whether there was any harm associated with i-CBT because there was no mention of harm or negative outcomes in any of the examined research. The researchers believe that future studies about the potential harms will be beneficial.
Do People Stick To It?: Mostly. They found that 52-80% of participants adhered to i-CBT without dropping out.
Are Clients Satisfied?: It seems like it. 61-100% of participants were satisfied with the programs.
Is It Better Than Face-To-Face CBT?: This study found that there were no significant differences between i-CBT and CBT administered in person.
Are Therapists Committed?: They found that therapists spent almost 8x more time on face-to-face clients than i-CBT clients.
In conclusion, it seems that internet-based therapy can be effective. But keep in mind, this research focuses on CBT as a therapeutic technique, not on internet therapy as a whole. It is also important to note that the researchers found no significant differences between internet-based and in-person CBT. This means that using internet-based therapy could be just as effective as seeing a therapist in person. Seeing a therapist in-person rather than through the internet is also a good way to ensure that your money will be going to an accredited practitioner, and not simply into the pocket of a technology company.
I would like to end by reminding you that you have rights as a consumer of any form of therapy. Both the APA and CPA (Canadian Psychological Association) code of ethics outline the guidelines that accredited practitioners must follow. You have the right to know who is performing your therapy and what their qualifications are. This includes the degrees or diplomas they hold, and whether they are qualified to perform certain tasks regarding your treatment. You also have the right to know what form of therapy you will be undergoing (CBT or otherwise), what your role is in your own therapy, how long it will take, and the reason why it was chosen as a treatment.
References
Andrews, G., Basu, A., Cuijpers, P., Craske, M., Mcevoy, P., English, C., & Newby, J. (2018). Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,55, 70-78. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.001
Canadian Psychological Association. (2017). Retrieved November 6, 2018, from https://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/committees/ethics/codeofethics/
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. (2017). Retrieved November 6, 2018, from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Novotney, A. (2017). A Growing Wave of Online Therapy. Retrieved November 6, 2018, from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/02/online-therapy.aspx
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing the best information and suggestions, I love your content, and they are very nice and very useful to us. If you are looking for the best online therapy websites, then visit iwilltherapy. I appreciate the work you have put into this.
ReplyDeleteThe website is looking bit flashy and it catches the visitors eyes. Design is pretty simple and a good user friendly interface.
ReplyDeletehttps://dynamichealthstaff.com/nursing-jobs-in-uk-for-indian-nurses